Making History: Transcribe is made possible in part by federal funding provided through the Library Services and Technology Act program administered by the Institute of Museum and Library Services.

William J. Isabell vs. Elisha Peters, etc.: Chancery Cause, Amherst County (Part 1 of 3)

image 1 of 21

Zoom in to read each word clearly.
Some images may have writing in several directions. To rotate an image, hold down shift-Alt and use your mouse to spin the image so it is readable.

This transcription is complete!

To the Honorable Lucas P Thompson Judge of the Circuit Superior Court of Law and Chancery for the County of Amherst (sitting of as Chancellor) your Orators William J Isbell, Robert Isbell and Maurice H Garland Administrator with the will annexed of Christopher Isbell deceased humbly represent:

That on the [blank] day of [blank] your Orator William Isbell as agent for his father Christopher Isbell (who was living but has since died) purchased for the said Christopher from a certain Seth Halsey of the town of Lynchburg a negro man slave named Edmund at the price of $300 for which your Orators William J and Robert, and the said Chris[to]pher executed their bond payable to the said [Seth] Halsey on the 1st day of January 1834 at the [page torn] of the said purchase, and in the various prelim[enary] conversations between the said Halsey and your Ora[tor] [Willi]am J. in relation thereto, the said Halsey unifor[mly] represented to your orator William J that the said slave was perfectly sound and free from disease and your orator William J confiding in the said representations and believing them to be true made the purchase and the bond aforesaid was executed in the manner before stated.

Your Orators charge that the said representations were wholly untrue and at the time of the purchase aforesaid was unsound and radically and permanently diseased and thence so continued until his death which occurred some short time after said purchase and was caused by the unsoundess and disease with which he was afflicted at the time of said purchase. The said slave rendered no service whatever after said purchase but on the contrary was a charge, and expense from the date of the purchase until his death, so that the whole consideration of said bond has utterly failed. After the diseased condition of said slave was discovered