Making History: Transcribe is made possible in part by federal funding provided through the Library Services and Technology Act program administered by the Institute of Museum and Library Services.

Tucker, Jesse v. Raines, Heartwell: Judgment, Brunswick County

image 2 of 63

Zoom in to read each word clearly.
Some images may have writing in several directions. To rotate an image, hold down shift-Alt and use your mouse to spin the image so it is readable.

This transcription is complete!

Tucker vs Raines We of the Jury do find for the plaintiff the Negroe in the Declaration Mentioned decd. if to be had if not then the price amounting to One Hundred & Twenty pounds & assess his Damages to [illegible] & Costs

Edward Davis

Tucker vs} Nar. Detinue Raines

May 1792 C.O. vs Deft. w. App. June C.O. vs. Deft. Comp. with [illegible] of Inquiry Sess. Non Deft & Issue Ro. BD Apr. 1793 Court Term Sifa. Court, [illegible] Apl. 1794 Court, Deft. Sept. Count., Plt. Ap. 1795 Judt. for plt. 3348 filed May 1 93

Tucker vs. Rains We of the jury do find for the plaintiff the Negroe in the Declaration mentioned as if to be had if not then she price amounting to one hundred & twenty pounds and [illegible] his damage to said and cost

Edward Davis